chill wrote: > > Or maybe the answer is for the udev script to run in the background > (with '&'), so that it doesn't block further activity. I don't know if > that works in the case of udev events. I'll do some more experimenting.
Nope - even running the udev script with '&' at the end, further activity is still blocked. So I think it's important that the udev rule is based on 'bind', rather than 'add'. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ chill's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=10839 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=113661 _______________________________________________ unix mailing list [email protected] http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/unix
