zaurux wrote: > It seems that without using a realtime kernel, the preempt function > improves things. > In theory, from version 5.16, this feature improves and becomes "full" > (with a lower latency without using a realtime kernel). > I am not a specialist and able to produce exotic kernels every other > day. > > My point is rather to be able to introduce tools to evaluate the > improvements beyond : "it's more transparent... it sounds better". > > In short, is it possible, for those who have a build and extension > platform, to compile a version of cyclictest in order to have a latency > evaluation tool ? > Even if this indicator is not everything (hardware, power supply, > buffers, etc. must also be taken into account), it is still correlated > with sq. > > https://wiki.linuxfoundation.org/realtime/documentation/howto/tools/cyclictest/start > > When will the 5.16 kernel be available in piCorePlayer ? :) > > And thanks for the work already done.
Is latency an issue with pre-recorded music that doesn't need to be synchronized with video? "To try to judge the real from the false will always be hard. In this fast-growing art of 'high fidelity' the quackery will bear a solid gilt edge that will fool many people" - Paul W Klipsch, 1953 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Julf's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=42050 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=116024 _______________________________________________ unix mailing list unix@lists.slimdevices.com http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/unix
