>If Apple is having 10.2 detect the CPU and not install, that is not cool. >Very microsoftian if you ask me. If they just stripped the 604 code out of >it to lean out the OS, then that is a really good idea. > >I mean come on, a 604 running 10.2? It's time to get an upgrade card for it >if you want to run a newer OS. I don't think 10.2 should run on a 604.
For what it's worth OS 10.1 makes a fine server OS on a 132MHz 604e with 168MB RAM. As long as you don't intend to do anything loony and processor hungry like run Photoshop then it's surprisingly useful considering, according to Apple, it's not even designed for use on 604es. I think it'd be a shame if they did remove 604 support from it but hell it's their OS at the end of the day.... -- -- Mark Benson Any spelling errors are attributed to PEBKAC Vintage Macs List Nanny SilValleyPirate - AIM silicon_valley_pirate_uk - Yahoo! Visit Flat Pack Macs Online: <http://fpm.gotdns.com> Macintosh LC Central -- Unsupported OS X is sponsored by <http://lowendmac.com/> Support Low End Mac <http://lowendmac.com/lists/support.html> Unsupported OS X list info <http://lowendmac.com/lists/unsupported.html> Send list messages to: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To unsubscribe, email: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For digest mode, email: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subscription questions: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Archive <http://www.mail-archive.com/unsupportedosx%40mail.maclaunch.com/> Using a Mac? Free email & more at Applelinks! http://www.applelinks.com
