Very off topic, just a couple comments.
Oh and under X the system dynamically allocates processor time for each processor by process, so sometimes you will see the OS being driven by one and apps being driven by the other, or similar behavior.
Sincerely,
David M. Ensteness On Nov 4, 2004, at 4:12 PM, Simon Brown wrote:
It would be interesting to bench test that theory.
When the beige G3's were released Apple pulled the 9600 350mhz off the market (until people started asking for them again as they wanted 6 PCI slots) as they were faster than the "new" generation of G3 machines which admittedly were only running at 233 and 266 mhz. This was also under OS 8.5 (if my memory is correct), OSX may be a different thing all together.
What would be good is if you could allocate one processor to system tasks and the other to application tasks, similar to the way the original Radius Rockets were able to be configured.
My 2c worth anyway
Simon
9600 G3/300 G5 1.8 Uniprocessor iBook 1.2
-- Unsupported OS X is sponsored by <http://lowendmac.com/>
Support Low End Mac <http://lowendmac.com/lists/support.html>
Unsupported OS X list info <http://lowendmac.com/lists/unsupported.html> --> AOL users, remove "mailto:" Send list messages to: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To unsubscribe, email: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For digest mode, email: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subscription questions: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Archive <http://www.mail-archive.com/unsupportedosx%40mail.maclaunch.com/>
Using a Mac? Free email & more at Applelinks! http://www.applelinks.com
