[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
My concern is the first part of your statement. If the 50 functions are almost identical, lots of repeated code, I'd make a new function to replace them and make better use of input parameters. 100 lines of good code usually outperform 5000.
I had a similar thought. My thought was, does the script flow in a way that all of the functions are used each time the script is run or does procedural determine which functions get called, of the ~50? If the fifty functions don't always get called, I would suggest that splitting them up into separate includes that only get included when needed may be a performance improvement. Less code for php to ignore [which takes system time to do.]
If, on the other hand, all ~50 functions get called every time the script runs, the single include method would be better.
And to touch the initial question, I *think* the switch would be [minimally] quicker.
-jim _______________________________________________ UPHPU mailing list [email protected] http://uphpu.org/mailman/listinfo/uphpu IRC: #uphpu on irc.freenode.net
