On 8/29/07, Scott Hill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 8/29/07, justin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > yeah they did. unhtmlentified ampersands.
> >
> >
>
> So, for those of us who need it spelled out, there is no restriction on the
> number of GET variables. The XHTML problem that he was having is, more than
> likely, the unhtmlentified ampersands.  OK.  Got it.
>

right. sorry.

since a single GET variable is encoded in the query "?var1=foo", and
two would be written "?var1=foo&var2=bar", he would only see
validation issues (i.e. an unhtmlentified '&') when he uses two GET
variables.

lonnie's right though. GET variables are generally bad for both humans
and search engines, which basically covers the target audience for
most websites.

justin
-- 
http://justinhileman.com

_______________________________________________

UPHPU mailing list
[email protected]
http://uphpu.org/mailman/listinfo/uphpu
IRC: #uphpu on irc.freenode.net

Reply via email to