Ben Reece wrote:
True -- though the closest you'd have is 2 days when doing from +5
days to 0 days.
hmmm. not sure about this. not doubting you, just haven't thought on it
thoroughly enough to have an opinion on the assertion. :) i do know that
my instinct was saying that the problem was the same, just reversed. :(
in all, i think i have to bite the bullet and look at individual client
histories. :( not my preferred method but it does seem to be the most
robust while still solving the duplicate issue.
still, interested in any other thoughts that might get me there more
efficiently. :) :)
thnx again,
-jim
Jim Anderson wrote:
initial looks tells me that the following won't work either. run the
following:
SELECT DATE_ADD('2007-02-28', INTERVAL 6 MONTH) + INTERVAL 49 DAY =
CURDATE();
SELECT DATE_ADD('2007-03-01', INTERVAL 6 MONTH) + INTERVAL 45 DAY =
CURDATE();
those 2 queries both return true. notice, though, that they are 1
calendar day apart and 4 interval days apart. this is going to have
the same basic effect as before. :(
i think the least development time is going to run a check to see if
the email has been sent within 5 days and , if so, don't send it
again. [5 days chosen as the largest margin of duplication, that i
can see, is 4 days [february] but this would happen in any month
begin/end cycle.]
i do like the brain storming though. feel free to keep up the ideas!
thnx,
-ja
Ben Reece wrote:
Jim Anderson wrote:
A good suggestion. I thought of that as well, but seem to remember
coming across similar issues. I've had about 15 things in my head
throughout the day so I may be getting some of my issues/projects
schmeared though. Do you think doing it that way would skip over
anyone? I saw that as an unlikely, but possible, concern.
i was thinking something like:
WHERE DATE_ADD(start_date, INTERVAL 6 MONTH) + INTERVAL 45 DAY =
CURDATE()
but i haven't had the time to test it out.
to fill out the scenario a bit fuller, the criteria is this:
* 9 different emails. one for each of the following date scenarios.
* six months after sign-up minus 45 days
* six months after sign-up minus 30 days
* six months after sign-up minus 15 days
* six months after sign-up minus 5 days
* six months after sign-up [minus 0 days]
* six months after sign-up plus 15 days
* six months after sign-up plus 30 days
* six months after sign-up plus 45 days
* six months after sign-up plus 60 days
That is the schedule that i have in place.
-jim
I don't see any problem with that statement -- seems like it would
work without any problems. The only possible issue would be that
the emails might not be the exact number of days apart that you
show, since you're adding months, and the date can move a little bit
because of that.
Ben
_______________________________________________
UPHPU mailing list
[email protected]
http://uphpu.org/mailman/listinfo/uphpu
IRC: #uphpu on irc.freenode.net
_______________________________________________
UPHPU mailing list
[email protected]
http://uphpu.org/mailman/listinfo/uphpu
IRC: #uphpu on irc.freenode.net
_______________________________________________
UPHPU mailing list
[email protected]
http://uphpu.org/mailman/listinfo/uphpu
IRC: #uphpu on irc.freenode.net
