I prefer kohana due to the light footprint. It is also developed for
php 5. However cake has a much larger community and more addon modules.
It's a toss up. I like to do a lot of my own system arch. which makes
kohana win my vote
Sent from my iPhone
On Jan 15, 2009, at 11:08 PM, Brandon Stout <[email protected]> wrote:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
First a couple questions now that we had a meeting about cakephp.
When
I looked at it a few months ago, I was surprised to see that they were
still writing their product for PHP 4, and the documentation stated
they
did not plan to support PHP 5 since 'most people are still using PHP
4'
(loosely quoted). Since PHP 5 has been out a few years, I thought
that
was pretty lame, and went with Kohana ( http://kohanaphp.com ). Since
then, Mac Newbold mentioned to me that cakephp had a beta product that
does support PHP 5. Now my questions:
* If it supports both PHP 4 and 5, does it take advantage sufficiently
of PHP 5 OOP?
* Is there a lot of bloat since you have to sometimes do the same
thing
two different ways: the PHP 4 way and the PHP 5 way? It seems that an
application should support one or the other, not both at the same time
for that reason.
* Are there any Kohana PHP users out there that prefer one over the
other, and if so, what?
Brandon Stout
Stout Hosting LLC
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.9 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with SUSE - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iEYEARECAAYFAklwJEUACgkQx0pgn74qrcKbIACgnm2NtoKE0EZQJNR48aAYQnSU
FFMAn2hsP5gcg5I/TKotUustE+zkdPS7
=AHLa
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________
UPHPU mailing list
[email protected]
http://uphpu.org/mailman/listinfo/uphpu
IRC: #uphpu on irc.freenode.net
_______________________________________________
UPHPU mailing list
[email protected]
http://uphpu.org/mailman/listinfo/uphpu
IRC: #uphpu on irc.freenode.net
