What kind of fits would you expect?
The only thing with replication I would expect is that there would be
a little delay because a 20mb is going to take a little longer to
transfer than a 1kb text field...
- Sean Thayne
On Jul 30, 2009, at 8:39 AM, Joseph Scott <[email protected]>
wrote:
On Jul 29, 2009, at 3:05 PM, Sean Thayne wrote:
It can be a shared resource, it can handle requests on the
localhost or by
vmware images in the same way.
I don't have to create a bunch of symlinks to folders and use nfs/
samba for
vmware images
It is password protected
I can easily attach additional information to a file, without
actually
touching the file
I can use foreign keys to handle garbage collection of files
I can easily manage additional versions of files... For instance I
could
cache different versions of a image.
All in all I think it would just be much easier to manage a large
set of
files in a database, rather than a filesystem
Are you going to be (or planning to in the future) any sort of
database replication? I haven't tested this particular case, but
I'd expect the single threaded/serialized nature of MySQL
replication have some fits with 20MB data fields.
--
Joseph Scott
[email protected]
http://josephscott.org/
_______________________________________________
UPHPU mailing list
[email protected]
http://uphpu.org/mailman/listinfo/uphpu
IRC: #uphpu on irc.freenode.net
_______________________________________________
UPHPU mailing list
[email protected]
http://uphpu.org/mailman/listinfo/uphpu
IRC: #uphpu on irc.freenode.net
