We already have colocation, our contract is nearly up and we are just looking for a new provider and exploring options. I've had a couple of recommendations for Center7 so far, so I'll be taking a look at what they offer. Fiber.net is one I'm familiar with, but I've heard mixed things there.
As to *why* we need colocation vs. a hosted setup, I can't go into much detail here, but we have some very specific hardware, networking and connectivity requirements that we have to comply with, so we either have to colocate or host it in-house. Michael On Tue, Jun 8, 2010 at 1:46 PM, Jonathan Duncan <[email protected] > wrote: > > On 08 Jun 2010, at 13:04, Michael Jones wrote: > > > Hola, > > > > I'm looking for some opinions on local colo options (SLC or Utah > County). > > I know a few people had mentioned items before, especially related to > > dedicated hosting options, but as we're looking for colo space, I know > the > > experiences can be different. > > > > Obviously need someone who has good redunancy and is stable, a couple of > > deal breakers would be non-water-based fire suppression and PCI > compliance. > > I know a few of you have had problems with Fiber.net, which is one of the > > options we've looked at, and I'd be curious to hear what some of those > are, > > as well as any good suggestions or tips you may have. > > > > Feel free to ping me off-list, or on Twitter or IRC (TuxToaster). > > > > Do you NEED co-location or do you just think you need co-location? There > are some great facilities in Orem including Fiber.net and Center7. But what > are the requirements that you have that make you NEED co-location? > > Regards, > Jonathan Duncan _______________________________________________ UPHPU mailing list [email protected] http://uphpu.org/mailman/listinfo/uphpu IRC: #uphpu on irc.freenode.net
