That's a good suggestion: offering both options.
On May 17, 2011, at 18:50, Aaron Luman <[email protected]> wrote: > I usually see it as an either or situation. Meaning, they give me the link > and then in the next line explain that if that doesn't work I should try to > log in and provide the key that follows. The would probably be the same as > is found in the url, but wouldn't have to be. That way there is an > alternative for those who can't get the link to work. > > Aaron > > On May 17, 2011, at 5:35 PM, [email protected] wrote: > >> I have a system where customers need to verify their email address. I am >> using the popular method of emailing them a URL that contains a unique key >> that they have to click. Many users ate unable to successfully complete >> this. Any ideas on other methods for verifying someone's email? The only >> other method I have seen or can think of would be emailing them a code that >> they have to return to the site with and key in but I don't see that as >> being any easier. >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> >> UPHPU mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://uphpu.org/mailman/listinfo/uphpu >> IRC: #uphpu on irc.freenode.net > > > _______________________________________________ > > UPHPU mailing list > [email protected] > http://uphpu.org/mailman/listinfo/uphpu > IRC: #uphpu on irc.freenode.net _______________________________________________ UPHPU mailing list [email protected] http://uphpu.org/mailman/listinfo/uphpu IRC: #uphpu on irc.freenode.net
