+1 from me too for Eric and Andrew

Parker Grimes
Southern Utah University


On 7/28/07, John Fereira <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> At 04:50 AM 7/28/2007, Andrew Petro wrote:
> >Jonathan, thank you for bringing this nomination and selection task
> >to the attention of the uPortal developers.
> >
> > > I would appreciate one of you picking up the ball and taking the next
> step.
> >
> >uPortal committers:
> >I see this going one of two directions, either fine.  One is that,
> >Apache-style, we arrive at happy consensus as to whom the two
> >uPortal-developer-selected steering committee members will be.  I
> >see that Cris Holdorph and Drew Wills have already spoken up along
> >these lines.  Additional momentum could result in a feeling of consensus.
> >Enough +1s and no objections to Cris's proposal, and we've had our
> >vote.  It's not totally implausible that this approach could work
> >for a small community such as ours.  And I think Eric Dalquist would
> >make a particularly excellent steering committee representative.
>
> +1 for Eric and Andrew from me too.
>
>
>
>
>
> >Another direction we may need to go here is a more formal process of
> >nominations and voting.  In order to go that route we'd need to
> >bootstrap some rules.
> >
> >
> >Here's what I propose as a framework for voting:
> >
> >1) uPortal committers may post nominations to this uportal-dev@
> >list, with the same deadline for nominations as that for the
> >stakeholder nominations.  That is, nominations must be posted to the
> >list by 5:00 PM EDT (GMT-4) on Wednesday, August 15, 2007.
> >2) We then vote, on the uportal-dev@ list, with each committer
> >invited to cast one vote for each open position (that is, in the
> >present case, two votes).  Voting closes on Tuesday, September 4,
> >2007 (to comport with "results announced soon after Wednesday,
> >September 5, 2007").
> >3) The top two vote recipients as of the election deadline are
> >recognized as the uPortal developer representatives to the steering
> committee.
> >4) The uportal committers look to the JA-SIG Elections Committee to
> >moderate this process, decide any election issues that may arise.
> >
> >I would look to the steering committee itself once instituted to
> >establish some procedures around future elections, handling future
> >committee vacancies, etc.
> >
> >
> >So, two questions:
> >1) Is there interest in pursuing Cris's nomination of myself and
> >Eric Dalquist to be the uPortal developer representatives to the
> >uPortal project steering committee, such that a more formal vote is
> >not necessary? +1s and/or objections to that approach would be
> >helpful.  If anyone has the objection "I'd prefer we have a more
> >formal vote than look for less formal consensus", I think that's
> >worth hearing and would be a good reason to go the more formal vote
> route.
>
> +1 for the informal vote, at least for this election.  Of course, if
> we start to get lots of nominations for other people that would
> complicate things.  If that happens,  I suggest we use the formal
> model that you've described.  In other words,  amend the formal vote
> process such that if at the end of the nomination process there are
> only as many people nominated for which there are vacancies, and the
> nominees have not received a -1, a formal vote is not necessary.
>
>
>
> >2) If a more formal vote is necessary, are the above rules supported
> >by the participants?  Are they sufficient? Discussion towards
> >consensus on the rules here may be helpful.
> >
> >Andrew
> >
> >Jonathan Markow wrote:
> >>Yesterday the JA-SIG Election Committee distributed a Call for
> >>Nominations announcing the start of an election cycle for two board
> >>director positions and three uPortal Project Steering Committee
> >>stakeholder positions.  Information about the steering committee,
> >>the elections, and other governance-related items can be found at
> >>http://www.ja-sig.org/wiki/display/JSG/JA-SIG+Governance.
> >>
> >>The steering committee model calls for two developers, to be
> >>selected by the group of current committers, to serve on the
> >>committee.  This selection isn't governed by a board-defined
> >>election process.  It's left up to you to determine how to best
> >>choose the two developer representatives.
> >>
> >>The formal election process for directors and stakeholders will
> >>take approximately six weeks, starting with yesterday's
> >>announcement.  I'd like to encourage you folks to begin your own
> >>process now so that the developer representatives can be announced
> >>concurrently with the stakeholders and board rep.  At that point we
> >>should be ready to go with a first steering committee meeting
> >>(which likely will be via telephone).  I will also participate in
> >>an ex officio capacity as Acting JA-SIG Executive Director.
> >>
> >>The wiki documentation about the uPortal Project Steering Committee
> >>is fairly skeletal and that's intentional.  This is our first
> >>experience with a governing committee of this type, and, while we
> >>have planned and vetted the concept for a number of months, we all
> >>are nevertheless going to be experiencing it for the first
> >>time.  Our expectation is that it will need some tweaking along the
> >>way, and we regard it as a work-in-progress to be refined as we
> >>collectively figure out what works and what doesn't.
> >>
> >>I would appreciate one of you picking up the ball and taking the
> >>next step.  I'll make myself available to answer any questions
> >>either by email or by conference call, and I know the rest of the
> >>board will extend the same offer.
> >>Best of luck with your selection process.  We're looking forward to
> >>bringing it all together.
> >>
> >>Thanks,
> >>Jonathan
> >>--
> >>You are currently subscribed to [email protected] as:
> >>[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >>To unsubscribe, change settings or access archives, see
> >>http://www.ja-sig.org/wiki/display/JSG/uportal-dev
> >
> >
> >--
> >You are currently subscribed to [email protected] as:
> >[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >To unsubscribe, change settings or access archives, see
> >http://www.ja-sig.org/wiki/display/JSG/uportal-dev
>
> John Fereira
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Ithaca, NY
>
>
> --
> You are currently subscribed to [email protected] as:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> To unsubscribe, change settings or access archives, see
> http://www.ja-sig.org/wiki/display/JSG/uportal-dev
>

-- 
You are currently subscribed to [email protected] as: [EMAIL 
PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe, change settings or access archives, see 
http://www.ja-sig.org/wiki/display/JSG/uportal-dev

Reply via email to