these folders appear to be filtered in FragmentActivator.java
(fragmentizeLayout method). in fact, changing line 458/459:
from:
if ( ! folder.getAttribute( "type" ).equals( "regular" ) ||
folder.getAttribute( "hidden" ).equals( "true" ) )
to:
if ( folder.getAttribute( "hidden" ).equals( "true" ) )
results in the header/footer of all fragments getting merged regardless
of which tab is selected. someone with some real solid knowledge of the
dlm rendering pipeline may be able to comment on the reprecussions of
such a change. i don't know whether this is a better behavior or not,
but it may warrant some discussion.
it would actually be cool to be able to configure this behavior.
1. dlm ignores header/footer
2. dlm merges header/footer from all fragments
3. dlm displays header/footer associated with the selected tab
thoughts anyone???
thanks, tim
Timothy Carroll wrote:
i found an interesting thing today...
specifying content for the header and footer folders within a fragment
seem to be ignored, so in order to have content in the header or
footer, you have to specify it using a template user rather than a
fragment. i was hoping to be able to have a completely empty template
user and use dlm merged fragments (exclusively) for role based content.
has anyone else experienced this behavior?
thanks, tim
--
You are currently subscribed to [email protected] as: [EMAIL
PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe, change settings or access archives, see
http://www.ja-sig.org/wiki/display/JSG/uportal-dev
