Jen, Excellent!
I've updated the portlet's wiki page <http://www.ja-sig.org/wiki/x/f4x7> to include a link to the source code and your install tips. I've also updated the UW Feedback Portlet wiki page <http://www.ja-sig.org/wiki/x/Ly8> to reflect its retirement to an SVN branch. Andrew Jen Bourey wrote: > OK, I've checked in the new feedback portlet. To deploy it, download > it from https://www.ja-sig.org/svn/portlets/FeedbackPortlet/trunk. > Run a "mvn install" in the root directory, then use the "ant > deployPortletApp" task to deploy the resulting war. The portlets > should work in either 2.6 or 3. > > If you're looking for the old feedback portlet, I've archived it in > the branches. > > - Jen > > > On Jan 30, 2008 5:13 PM, Eric Dalquist <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> wrote: > > No, the old version was only a one time code dump of a portlet > authored > here at UW and we would probably look at using the new version > anyways. > > +1 for this approach from me. > > -Eric > > Drew Wills wrote: > > Jen, > > > > I'm all for replacing the old with the new unless some new > compelling > > evidence in favor of keeping the old comes to light. > > > > Questions (basically restatements of yours): > > - Have there been any recent updates to the old version? > > - Is anyone currently using the old version? If so, is there any > > feature gap? > > > > If no one speaks up on behalf of the existing Feedback portlet, I'd > > think you're free to replace it. > > > > drew > > > > > > Jen Bourey wrote: > >> I'd like to go ahead and get this in the ja-sig repository, but I > >> want to minimize confusion with the other feedback portlet. Are > >> there critical features present in the other portlet that aren't in > >> the unconference version? Do we want to have two versions? A > >> suggestion was put forward in IRC chat to replace the trunk of the > >> current FeedbackPortlet with the unconference version, but I wanted > >> to see if anyone is currently relying on the trunk. > >> > >> What would other people like to do? Should we combine the > projects, > >> or keep two versions? If we combine them, would people like > the new > >> version to go into the trunk, or into a branch until more > people have > >> looked at it? > >> > >> - Jen > >> > >> > >> On Jan 23, 2008 10:29 AM, Jen Bourey <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >> <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>>> wrote: > >> > >> Great! Once I get it posted maybe we can determine > whether there > >> are any other features that should be added. > >> > >> I also really like the idea of having a consolidated email > list. I > >> worry that needing to create a separate JIRA instance, > email list, > >> svn location, etc. will be too much overhead for new > projects and > >> might prevent people from sharing their work. I also worry > that > >> separating out all the lists will prevent people from hearing > >> information that they might be interested in. I know I'd > prefer to > >> just join one portlet email list and hear about all > updates, rather > >> than needing to join a new list every time a portlet I'm > interested > >> in is created. Especially since many portlet projects might be > >> fairly small, it seems to make sense not to create too much > >> administrative infrastructure around them. As we add > portlets to > >> the uPortal distribution or create a portlets package, having a > >> consolidated email list may become even more use! ful. > >> > >> - Jen > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> On Jan 22, 2008 11:46 AM, Drew Wills <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >> <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>>> wrote: > >> > >> Great work Jen! I'll be talking to the schools I work with > >> suggesting > >> they put it in their portals. > >> > >> > >> Jason Shao wrote: > >> > > >> >> One idea is perhaps a jasig-portlets-user and > >> jasig-portlet-dev list > >> >> to consolidate a bit as we don't have much portlet > >> related email > >> >> traffic on any list as of yet.? > >> > > >> > I suspect that portlet-specific infrastructure makes the > >> possibility of > >> > our really cool "XXX" portlet also looking open to > >> deployers on > >> > non-uPortal platforms, wheras jasig-portlets feels > like it's > >> a JA-SIG > >> > specific portlet bundle. > >> > >> +1 from me for consolidated email lists (Eric's version) -- > >> also for > >> consolidated JIRA & Confluence space, etc. At least, I > >> suggest that > >> small, general-purpose JA-SIG portlets -- harmless ones > that > >> most > >> schools should at least consider deploying -- can share an > >> infrastructure. Anything big or specific, like SIS > >> integrations or > >> perhaps a suite of personal data tools that work together, > >> probably can > >> and should be separate. > >> > >> Insisting that every portlet must have its own version > of these > >> resources seems like a big barrier to entry for a little > >> portlet. I'm > >> afraid it will influence folks to hold on to things they > >> might have > >> contributed. > >> > >> And if you create a new email list for each portlet, > who will > >> sign up? > >> I suspect each individual portlet won't generate much > traffic -- > >> keeping > >> them together means that anyone who subscribes will get > some > >> good info > >> about new portlets or cool new features in existing ones. > >> > >> drew wills > >> > >> -- > >> Andrew Wills > >> UNICON, Inc. > >> Office: (480) 558-2476 > >> http://code.google.com/p/cernunnos/ > >> > >> -- > >> You are currently subscribed to > [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> > >> <mailto:[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>> as: > >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> > >> To unsubscribe, change settings or access archives, see > >> http://www.ja-sig.org/wiki/display/JSG/uportal-dev > >> > >> > >> > >> -- > >> You are currently subscribed to [email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]> as: > >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >> To unsubscribe, change settings or access archives, see > >> http://www.ja-sig.org/wiki/display/JSG/uportal-dev > > > > > -- > You are currently subscribed to [email protected] as: [EMAIL > PROTECTED] > To unsubscribe, change settings or access archives, see > http://www.ja-sig.org/wiki/display/JSG/uportal-dev -- Join your friends and colleagues at JA-SIG 2008 - "Higher Education Solutions: The Community Source Way!" April 27th - 30th, 2008 in St. Paul, Minnesota USA Featuring CAS, DSpace, Fedora, Fluid, Internet2, Kuali, Sakai, uPortal, and more! Information/Registration at: http://www.ja-sig.org/conferences/08spring/index.html You are currently subscribed to [email protected] as: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe, change settings or access archives, see http://www.ja-sig.org/wiki/display/JSG/uportal-dev
