On 05/06/2010 10:16 AM, Gary Weaver wrote:
No, from a portlet developer's point of view it is either 168 or 286. If you want to play with 286 dev while we get pluto 2 integrated into uPortal you can give their little development portal a try. It has full 286 support in a very simple portal UI.Eric, Thanks! A few questions: * Is there any advantage of working with trunk currently vs. the 3.2.1 release for those who would really like to be prepared for/use uP 3.3 (well, specifically JSR-286/Pluto 2)?
* Should trunk be working via same method as used below for setup and/or is there an easier/preferred way to set it up?
Yes that should work.
I have been well learned to not provide these ... especially with a 4 week old baby at home :) I know there is at least another ~ 40 hours of dedicated dev time going into the pluto 2 work this month. As soon as we have something working in the branch it will be merged back into trunk and we'll cut a M1 release which will include a quickstart.* Could you provide a SWAG (like<= few days,<= few weeks,<= month,<= few months,<= several months, etc. - no one would hold you to the guess, but just to help with our planning) for when the working-pluto-2.0 branch might be stable enough to be merged back into trunk?
Hrm, when I switch back to uPortal coding next week from my normally scheduled work I'll take a run through the tasks and post a list here that would be good for folks with time to take a look at.Also, please let me know if I can help work on anything here or there while I have a chance (as non-committer, just providing patches) that would help get uP 3.3 out more quickly. No job is too small or tedious if it needs to be done, although I can't guarantee how much time I would have to work on tasks.
Thanks, -Eric
Thanks! Gary On May 5, 2010, at 6:31 PM, Eric Dalquist wrote:Nope it is not working. Wait for pluto 2 to be merged back into trunk. On 5/5/10 4:09 PM, Gary Weaver wrote:Know you guys are busy, but was hoping to try to start building against the pluto 2 dev version of uPortal. At first I looked at trunk, and after a while I noticed it was still using Pluto 1.1.7. So then I found https://www.ja-sig.org/svn/uPortal/branches/working-pluto-2.0 and figured out that I could do the following to setup a build environment: * Be sure JAVA_HOME set to Java 1.6 for each terminal window opened. (I set TOMCAT_HOME also) * Setup a clean Tomcat 6. * (Read http://www.ja-sig.org/wiki/display/UPM31/01+Tomcat ) ** Set following to conf/catalina.properties shared.loader=${catalina.base}/shared/classes,${catalina.base}/shared/lib/*.jar ** Add emptySessionPath="true" to relevant connectors in conf/server.xml (like connector on port 8080) * Create (tomcat6)/shared/lib and (tomcat6)/shared/classes directories * Alter (tomcat6)/bin/catalina.sh (or .bat but this is for .sh) to up memory: JAVA_OPTS="$JAVA_OPTS -Xmx1024m -XX:MaxPermSize=256m -XX:+CMSClassUnloadingEnabled -XX:+CMSPermGenSweepingEnabled" Do that outside of any conditionals/if's for example: ... if [ -z "$LOGGING_MANAGER" ]; then JAVA_OPTS="$JAVA_OPTS -Djava.util.logging.manager=org.apache.juli.ClassLoaderLogManager" else JAVA_OPTS="$JAVA_OPTS $LOGGING_MANAGER" fi JAVA_OPTS="$JAVA_OPTS -Xmx1024m -XX:MaxPermSize=256m -XX:+CMSClassUnloadingEnabled -XX:+CMSPermGenSweepingEnabled" ... * Get uPortal: svn co https://www.ja-sig.org/svn/uPortal/branches/working-pluto-2.0/ cd working-pluto-2.0 * Copy build.properties.sample to build.properties and fill in everything. Even though maven.home commented out, I found it had to be set even if maven2/bin (mvn) was on path. * Build/copy wars and jars: ant deployPortletApp * Start HSQL: ant hsql * In new terminal window... * Set JAVA_HOME (and TOMCAT_HOME). * Populate the DB (I couldn't run the init-db target it said to. instead of bothering to look into I ran the other one): ant initportal * Start tomcat. In catalina.log there are tons of errors like: Exception in thread "Timer-(some number)" java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError: org/apache/pluto/driver/container/ApplicationIdResolver Basically it just looks as if it isn't integrated yet, so I assume it is in process of integration. Not asking for an early release, but is there a good release version of that branch that you'd recommend I try that might be stable enough to build against that would provide enough value to merit not just using 3.2.1 instead? Thanks! Gary
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
