We did a load test last month against 3.2.1 with patches that lead up to 3.2.2. It looked as though we could support about 250 users per node with our configuration averaging around 2.5 seconds of page generation time measured right at the host. We used 300 different student accounts in the test, 50 faculty accounts, and 50 staff accounts. We focused primarily on loading fragments, not interacting with a specific portlet.
We launched that way, so I don't have any other versions to compare against. On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 11:36 AM, Benito J. Gonzalez <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi All, > > Has anyone had performance issues with the latest release under load? We > see a large difference in performance between our current 3.0.2 release and > 3.2.2. CPU and memory usage were low. My guess is there are missing > indices. We did some optimization of our 3.0.2 db but no optimization of > 3.2.2. > > Any other ideas to check? > > Thanks, > > -- > Benito J. Gonzalez > Manager, Enterprise Web Application Development > Information Technology Department > University of California, Merced > Desk: 209.228.2974 > Cell: 209.201.5052 > Email: [email protected] > > > -- > You are currently subscribed to [email protected] as: > [email protected] > To unsubscribe, change settings or access archives, see > http://www.ja-sig.org/wiki/display/JSG/uportal-dev > -- Bruce Tong Software Engineer Office of Information Technology Ohio University -- You are currently subscribed to [email protected] as: [email protected] To unsubscribe, change settings or access archives, see http://www.ja-sig.org/wiki/display/JSG/uportal-dev
