Nevermind, I can see you have a list of folks on that wiki page. On Fri, Sep 30, 2011 at 3:22 PM, Bruce Tong <[email protected]> wrote: > This includes portlet contributions, or just to the core of uPortal? > > On Fri, Sep 30, 2011 at 3:18 PM, Eric Dalquist > <[email protected]> wrote: >> Great, so with that support I need anyone that has committed to uPortal in >> the past and is planning on contributing to uPortal in the future to go and >> sign up for an account on GitHub. Once that is done please either reply here >> or update the table on the wiki page with your account info: >> https://wiki.jasig.org/display/UPC/Git+Migration+Proposal#GitMigrationProposal-UsernameMapping >> >> For example, I'm "edalquist" in SVN but on GitHub I'm "Eric Dalquist >> <[email protected]>" >> >> This isn't critical but if we don't map usernames when we do the switch your >> old commits won't be associated with your new GitHub username. >> >> -Eric >> >> On 09/29/2011 05:56 PM, Cris J Holdorph wrote: >>> >>> My vote after 4.0.1 is released, will be +1. >>> >>> ---- Cris J H >>> >>> On 09/29/2011 03:48 PM, Steve Swinsburg wrote: >>>> >>>> With the svn read-only mirror and the other discussions that have taken >>>> place around governance, my vote is now a +1. >>>> >>>> cheers, >>>> Steve >>>> >>>> On 30/09/2011, at 7:45 AM, Eric Dalquist wrote: >>>> >>>>> The GitHub migration vote currently stands at: >>>>> >>>>> Binding: >>>>> 3 +1 >>>>> 1 0 >>>>> 0 -0 >>>>> NonBinding: >>>>> 2 +1 >>>>> 0 0 >>>>> 0 -0 >>>>> >>>>> This is enough to pass by the project voting standards but I wanted to >>>>> bring this up one last time before scheduling the migration for additional >>>>> input. The 4.0.1 release will be cut Friday the 30th and announced on >>>>> Monday. If there is no objection from this discussion I'll work on >>>>> planning >>>>> the migration to GitHub after the announcement. >>>>> >>>>> One thing I'd like anyone here who contributes code to uPortal, either >>>>> directly or through patches, is to take a look at this REALLY good git >>>>> workflow documentation: >>>>> https://github.com/diaspora/diaspora/wiki/Git-Workflow It is a great >>>>> example >>>>> of how get helps provide a much nicer workflow for both developers and the >>>>> project/branch leads as far as committing and merging in changes. >>>>> >>>>> The full proposal is on the wiki: >>>>> https://wiki.jasig.org/display/UPC/Git+Migration+Proposal >>>>> >>>>> -Eric >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >> >> > > > > -- > Bruce Tong > Software Engineer > Office of Information Technology > Ohio University >
-- Bruce Tong Software Engineer Office of Information Technology Ohio University -- You are currently subscribed to [email protected] as: [email protected] To unsubscribe, change settings or access archives, see http://www.ja-sig.org/wiki/display/JSG/uportal-dev
