I, too, am wondering why you want to remove it. Very simple portlets
might not require regular commits. What is the motivating rationale?
JimH
On 12/10/13, 3:04 PM, AUXEPAULES Ludovic wrote:
We use the Bookmarks Portlet at UPMC.
Why remove a Jasig Sponsored Portlet that works instead of trying to update or
enhance it ?
Ludovic Auxepaules
-----Message d'origine-----
De : [email protected]
[mailto:[email protected]] De la part de Paul Gazda
Envoyé : mardi 10 décembre 2013 20:10
À : [email protected]
Objet : RE: [uportal-dev] Take BookmarksPortlet out of 4.1?
We use the Bookmarks portlet, but could download and deploy the code separately.
This might be worth posting on the uportal-user list to ask the broader user
audience.
Paul
-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected]
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Drew Wills
Sent: Tuesday, December 10, 2013 11:44 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: [uportal-dev] Take BookmarksPortlet out of 4.1?
Hey folks,
Would anyone object to removing (de-bundling) the BookmarksPortlet for the
upcoming 4.1 release?
We have largely moved away from portlets that start out blank and require users to
do data entry -- which is what Bookmarks is. Meanwhile we're building &
bundling more and more compelling portlets, which gradually increases to build
times and needs for PermGen space.
Bookmarks hasn't received commits since Feb 2012. I think we're better off
trimming it for the next release.
drew
--
You are currently subscribed to [email protected] as:
[email protected] To unsubscribe, change settings or access archives, see
http://www.ja-sig.org/wiki/display/JSG/uportal-dev
--
You are currently subscribed to [email protected] as:
[email protected] To unsubscribe, change settings or access archives,
see http://www.ja-sig.org/wiki/display/JSG/uportal-dev
--
You are currently subscribed to [email protected] as:
[email protected]
To unsubscribe, change settings or access archives, see
http://www.ja-sig.org/wiki/display/JSG/uportal-dev
