On Nov 30, 2007 2:13 AM, Ismael Luceno <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > El Thu, 29 Nov 2007 13:16:57 +0000 > > "Rob Ubuntu Linux" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escribió: > > > On Nov 29, 2007 5:16 AM, Ismael Luceno <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > wrote: > > > El Wed, 28 Nov 2007 12:17:22 +0000 > > > "Rob Ubuntu Linux" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escribió:
> I'm not talking about persuading anyone to use another protocol, just > to make dbus optional. Nothing really _needs_ to talk to init, its > useful, but it should be optional, you can make a simple event-gateway > between d-bus and the "init-bus". It is optional. Sys V init doesn't use IPC. Sys V init, was static, generally everything configured was started on boot, all hardware present, and the control was by the admin doing start/stop/restart/reload/status, plus changing the run-level. You could view the signals, passing wait statuses as limitted events. Upstart, is trying to handle the dynamic hotplugging, and applet type control stuff nicely; by being event driven. The event messages by whole slew of programs are on D-Bus. But there's the "emit ... start" type possibility to. Why have the "init-bus" protocol, what is going to talk it? -- upstart-devel mailing list [email protected] Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/upstart-devel
