On Wed, 2008-06-18 at 17:04 -0700, Saravanan Shanmugham (sarvi) wrote: > But that said, D-Bus is a fine choice for now. I hope though, the > Upstart community is open to code contributions from us that allow for > modular alternatives to D-Bus. Ofcourse without compromising on > performance or clean code. > Would the effort not be better spend fixing whatever problem(s) you have with D-Bus?
It really has become the standard communication mechanism for Linux, and would greatly benefit from an embedded eye. Scott -- Have you ever, ever felt like this? Had strange things happen? Are you going round the twist?
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- upstart-devel mailing list [email protected] Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/upstart-devel
