On Thu, 2008-06-26 at 05:26 -0700, Garrett Cooper wrote: > LTP has a number of whitebox and blackbox tests in place [3], > most of the whitebox tests being C API's and the blackbox tests being > shell invocations of Unix commands, as well as a well-defined set of > test reporting API's and functions already in place. > So, my question is two-fold: > 1. Would the upstart project be willing to work with LTP (via my > team as a proxy in the beginning) to enter some unit test code and > other test cases into LTP's test framework / overall testsuite, and > improve acceptance in the Linux testing community? > 2. Would either group be willing to work with my team to help > maintain these testcases and develop new ones? > I entirely support anybody who wishes to add more test cases for Upstart, either to its code base (which already has an over-90% coverage for its "white box" test suite) or to external projects.
It's not something I can honestly say I have additional time to devote to; I'll continue to ensure all code in trunk and in releases is submitted with near-100% test coverage (as per merge policy), however I don't have time to help out with an additional test framework. Obviously I'll provide whatever support I can to others who want to do that work, including yourself. Scott -- Have you ever, ever felt like this? Had strange things happen? Are you going round the twist?
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- upstart-devel mailing list [email protected] Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/upstart-devel
