On Fri, 2008-07-18 at 23:09 +0200, Arnaud Quette wrote: > next, a personal point of view about the lack of upstream adoption of > upstart: > I wanted to provide an upstart script for NUT for some time, but never > found enough matching example to do so. > the embedded scripts only address inittab, and the > replacement-initscripts are unreachable (see below) and far too basic > for being really helpful! > if you want a massive adoption, provide some "real world" examples for > upstreams, really ;-) > Upstart is not yet finished, and the job definition format undergoes incompatbile changes with each minor release.
For this reason, I would not recommend migrating your service to using an Upstart job at this time. > another point (possibly already addressed): you should also take a > look at the HAL replacement (DeviceKit) since it should (must?) > somehow impact upstart (at least through signaling), or improve it?! > I will soon post on the new dk mailing a proposition for the power > management. if you also have some feedback there... > The DeviceKit author and I are friends, are very much in communication. Scott -- Have you ever, ever felt like this? Had strange things happen? Are you going round the twist?
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- upstart-devel mailing list [email protected] Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/upstart-devel
