-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 12/20/10 8:29 PM, Marc Weber wrote: > Its the time output of zsh. ab is the benchmark tool which ships with > apache. So you don't see the CPU time of the server process, but the one > of the benchmark tool. The "total" time is the time it takes until you > see the shell prompt again.
I see. Is the server and client running on the same machine? If they are, I can't see that as being a particularly valid test. > I also compared with http -t20 and -c 10 (concurrency). Apache + PHP was > a lot faster as well. The effect of caches in the database couldn't be ignored, either, unless you are purging the tables in-between requests. > PHP time drops very fast if you start load configuration options loading > classes. In a real application urweb would outperform PHP very fast. Yeah. I think on these very small workloads it's probably not statistically meaningful to make comparisons unless they are averaged over a large number of samples. For larger applications and workloads the comparisons could become meaningful. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (Darwin) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJNDwb8AAoJEDd5xfOXfbYMn64IALBDZNCUMvUeksIQMj6R4r+m wA0zwQOMaAN381GxdPKBcqryu42EYjH3/1Oz7qe2Ka5vEZ5IANncibCakaPgYWMD OqTaVse9uHGCXBLdo/eI8hcM6rmCFPCKHEBVOGDIKza/YFkxZygZJftbGBmMfA+e BRTRu+prTKHYp+Y+QEyYyNeyz8RNyEz+LbgoJsdDD0+XsSQ6rk3OfdJkYfzGPW4r hT5I8+YQrlcOztEJT8lsI/6O7fmJgwgg0TPWNeZoX/rGLbrP8KBDIMOdqsaaGXRS pB3LhfPKN6lhT4cjiCZZwNBENbfpUqMRD5sVIPLzix286Mkdy/y0egCvgBP5b8Y= =UXZy -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ Ur mailing list [email protected] http://www.impredicative.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ur
