Bonjour

Pas pour relancer un vieux d�bat, mais ceci pose tout de m�me une question
int�ressante:

1) O� se situe l'�vidence la plus solide pour la comparison "scoop and run"
avec le "stay and play" en trauma, pour ceux qui ont r�vis� � fond la
question?

Par ailleurs, les d�lais �voqu�s ici sont tout de m�me surprenant.

CIao

ALain Vadeboncoeur
----- Original Message -----
From: "James S. Cohen, RR" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, March 16, 2002 10:36 PM
Subject: [EMED-L] Princess Diana


> To those of you with a particular interest in trauma EM or pre-hospital
care
> EM I shall recount some particulars of the night Princess Diana died
(August
> 31, 1998) as a lead up to some questions.
>
> The Mercedes crashed at 12:23 a.m. in a tunnel killing Prince Fayed and
his
> driver.  At 12:26 a.m. Dr. Frederic Maillez, a French EP, arrived.  At
12:29
> a.m. a military ambulance arrived.  At 12:40 a.m. the SAMU ambulance
> arrived.  This is the highest level "EMS" ambulance in France and all have
> physicians on board.  Diana was reported to be saying "My God, what
> happened" immediately after the accident.  She was treated at the scene
> until 1:20 a.m. at which time the SAMU began the trip to the hospital
> (Piete'-Salpetrier) that was 3.7 miles away.  She arrived at the hospital
at
> 2:01 a.m.   Her prehospital care consisted of IVFs, (no blood),
intubation,
> external cardiac compressions, and possibly intracardiac epinephrine
> (conflicting data on this last item).  At the hospital she received a
> thoracotomy, bypass etc.  Her reported injuries were a tear of the left
> pulmonary vein (repaired during surgery), 3 cm lac to forehead, cut lip,
> some crushed ribs, fracture right arm, 8 cm cut right thigh.
>
> Thus, it took about 1 hour 20 minutes from the SAMU arrival to delivery to
> the hospital.  At that time of night, with minimal traffic, the trip could
> have taken 5-10 minutes.
> Clearly, the French pre-hospital trauma system differs radically from the
> American one.  Fending off criticism  French medical authorities have
stated
> that they believe in stabilizing patients at the scene prior to transport.
> As for the slow ride to the hospital (average speed was 5 mph) they have
> stated that the slow ride was necessary to avoid bumps, shocks, and other
> acceleration/deceleration forces that would worsen the patient's
condition.
>
> Can anyone provide any references that support or otherwise "explain"
> (translation-think politics) the French system?  Although such references
> likely originated in France they may have been cited in English language
> journals. (nb-French citations OK, I can read French).  Can anyone tell me
> what other countries of the world use this French model? Does your EMS
> system have any units that carry Type O neg blood for administration in
the
> field?  Finally, what are the major studies in the USA that established
the
> "scoop and run, verses stay and play" model?
>
> thanks,
>
> James S. Cohen
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> To unsubscribe, send the command  "SIGNOFF EMED-L" to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Répondre à