Title: InfoPOEMs® - The Clinical Awareness System
Intéressant.
 
Alain


From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 24 octobre 2005 04:41
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: InfoPOEM: Pulmonary artery catheters: no harm, no benefit (PAC-Man)

Accueil Outils Cliniques
- Archive InfoPOEMs®*
- InfoRetriever®*
- Informations médicaments*
- Infobanque AMC
- Journaux EBSCOhost*
- MD Consult*
- Ovid Medline*
- JAMCél

Services amc.ca
- FMC/DPC Accréditée
- Boutique en ligne
- Mon site web
- Solutions pratiques

  


 *Service aux
  membres AMC



Pulmonary artery catheters: no harm, no benefit (PAC-Man)

Clinical question
Do patients in the intensive care unit benefit from being monitored by pulmonary artery catheters?

Bottom line
In this randomized trial, patients in the intensive care unit (ICU) do not benefit -- nor are they harmed -- by pulmonary artery catheters (PACs). (LOE = 1b)

Reference
Harvey S, Harrison DA, Singer M, et al, for the PAC-Man study collaboration. Assessment of the clinical effectiveness of pulmonary artery catheters in management of patients in intensive care (PAC-Man): a randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2005; 366:472-77.

Study design: Randomized controlled trial (nonblinded)

Funding: Government

Allocation: Concealed

Setting: Inpatient (ICU only)

Synopsis
In a previous study, the use of PACs in critically ill postoperative patients did not provide any advantage (New Engl J Med 2003; 348:5-14). In this multicenter British study, patients older than 16 years admitted to the ICU were randomly assigned (masked allocation) to receive invasive monitoring with PACs (n = 506) or to a control group managed without PACs (n = 508). The study began with more patients in each group, but the authors excluded those who didn't consent or who withdrew consent for participation; the same number of patients were excluded from each group. Clinicians or nurses caring for the patients collected data for the acute physiology and chronic health evaluation (APACHE II) severity scoring system and the sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA) score. These are all measures of severity of illness. The main outcome, assessed by intention to treat, was hospital mortality from any cause. To have 90% power to detect a 10% absolute mortality difference, the authors needed a total of 1281 patients, more than the 1014 they were able to enroll. The hospital mortality was the same in PAC group and the control group (68% and 66%, respectively; P = 0.4). Additionally, ICU mortality was the same in each group, as was total length of stay and ICU length of stay. Approximately 10% of the patients with PACs had complications, none fatal.

Répondre à