----- Forwarded Message ----
From: "Bryan Bledsoe, DO" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, June 18, 2007 10:35:56 PM
Subject: RE: So it's not just Orlando ! ? Adult Prehospital Intubation: More 
Harm Than Good?

Wes:

I know the researchers involved in most of this. Henry Wang at Pitt initially 
set out to show that prehospital intubations were beneficial. I am not sure 
about what happened in San Diego. Steve Katz’s paper many years ago showing a 
25% UEI in Orlando was a result of seeing so many problems.

I think this intubation issue is purely a regional thing. There are many areas 
where prehospital intubation and even RSI are as safe as in-hospital (e.g., 
Marv Wayne and his bunch at the Bellingham FD). But, there are obvious 
problems: Orange County (south Orlando) and San Diego County have a large 
number of paramedics and I think skills maintenance is the major issue.

Now, the bad part of the issue. I do not think we can continue to educate all 
paramedics in ETI because:

1. The usage of ETI in anesthesia and the hospital setting in general is 
declining. Approximately 40% of anesthesia cases in most hospitals are being 
performed with LMAs.

2. Because of the decline in ETI, there is and will be a greater demand for 
student experience in a dwindling number of patients. Thus, the EM residents, 
Anesthesia residents, Critical Care Fellows, and CRNA students will all have 
priority over the EMS people. In fact, respiratory therapy and other residents 
(IM, PEDS) may also have priority.

3. The private hospitals are trying to minimize the use of their paying 
patients as student subjects.

4. Some anesthesia groups are forbidden from allowing student intubations 
because they bargained a discount malpractice insurance rate.

5. Fresh cadavers are limited because now we have to ask the family for 
permission to practice on these. Socially, we often can’t do this. This used to 
be a major source of student practice.

6. There is no compelling literature that ETI provides a better airway than 
other modalities.

I think only certain paramedics in high-volume systems and perhaps only true 
CCPs—not UMBC grads will be the only ones using ETI in the future. There may be 
system rules that if you don’t do X intubations in a year, the privilege to 
intubate is pulled.

I would start getting comfortable with one of the alternative airways.

BEB 

From: Paramedicine@ yahoogroups. com [mailto:Paramedicine@ yahoogroups. com] On 
Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] com
Sent: Monday, June 18, 2007 8:59 AM
To: Paramedicine@ yahoogroups. com
Subject: Re: So it's not just Orlando ! ? Adult Prehospital Intubation: More 
Harm Than Good?

I hate to even suggest this, but is it possible that some (not all, mind you) 
physicians have a bias against EMS doing prehospital intubations?

Also, it bothers me that almost all EMS research is done in larger cities. As 
has been discussed on here before, much of the best practices in EMS are 
happening in smaller systems.

-Wes Ogilvie

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]


__._,_.___ 
Messages in this topic (0) Reply (via web post) | Start a new topic 
Messages | Files | Photos | Links | Database | Polls | Calendar 
Visit our website at www.paramedicine.com


 
Change settings via the Web (Yahoo! ID required) 
Change settings via email: Switch delivery to Daily Digest | Switch format to 
Traditional 
Visit Your Group | Yahoo! Groups Terms of Use | Unsubscribe Recent Activity
 3New Members
 1New Files
Visit Your Group 
SPONSORED LINKS
Emt paramedic
Paramedic uniform
Paramedic gift
Paramedic bag
Paramedic equipment
HDTV Support
on Yahoo! Groups
Help with Samsung
HDTVs and devices
Yoga Groups
Find Enlightenment
& exhange insights
with other members
Yahoo! 360°
Start Today
Get your own
place online. 
__,_._,___

Répondre à