Nous l'utilisons depuis des ann�es dans le service avec de bons r�sultats. Si des r�f�rences vous interessent...
Dr Bein Urgentiste ----- Original Message ----- From: "taboulet" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "URG-L Mailing List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, January 08, 2002 1:17 PM Subject: URG-L: Le magn�sium est efficace pour ralentir une FA Le magn�sium est efficace pour ralentir une FA (par action de frein sur le noeud AV). Ces deux r�f�rences le prouvent. Certains d'entre vous l'utilisent d�j� ? 1: Chiladakis JA, Stathopoulos C, Davlouros P, Manolis AS. Intravenous magnesium sulfate versus diltiazem in paroxysmal atrial fibrillation. Int J Cardiol 2001 Jul;79(2-3):287-91 BACKGROUND: Drugs currently available for the acute treatment of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation have significant limitations. We assessed the safety and effectiveness of intravenous magnesium sulfate versus diltiazem therapy in patients with prolonged episodes of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation. METHODS: In a prospective randomized trial, 46 symptomatic patients presenting with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation were given intravenous magnesium sulfate (n=23) or diltiazem (n=23) therapy. Primary outcome measures were effects on ventricular rate control and proportion of patients restored to sinus rhythm at 6 h after initiation of treatment. RESULTS: There were no differences in baseline characteristics between the two groups. Both forms of treatment were well tolerated, with no adverse clinical events. Both drugs had similar efficacy in reducing the ventricular rate at the first hour of treatment (P<0.05) with a tendency toward a further decrease during infusion times of 2 (P<0.01), 3, 4, 5 and 6 h, respectively (P<0.001). However, at the end of the 6-h treatment period, restoration of sinus rhythm was observed in a significantly higher proportion of patients in the magnesium group compared with the diltiazem group [13 of 23 patients, (57%), versus five of 23 patients, (22%), P=0.03]. CONCLUSIONS: Magnesium sulfate favorably affects rate control and seems to promote the conversion of long lasting episodes of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation to sinus rhythm, representing a safe, reliable and cost-effective alternative treatment strategy to diltiazem. 2: Eur J Emerg Med 2000 Dec;7(4):287-90 Magnesium efficacy in magnesium deficient and nondeficient patients with rapid ventricular response atrial fibrillation. Eray O, Akca S, Pekdemir M, Eray E, Cete Y, Oktay C. We assessed the effect of magnesium sulphate (MgSO4) on lowering the rate in ventricular atrial fibrillation (AF), and evaluated the effect of this therapy in magnesium (Mg) deficient and nondeficient patients. This experimental clinical study was performed on 34 patients with rapid AF (ventricular rate [VR] > 120/minute) presenting to the emergency department of a tertiary care university hospital. Patients with systolic blood pressure < or = 100 mmHg, Hb level < or = 11.8, saO2 of < or = 96%, BUN > or = 40 or creatine > or = 1.8 were excluded (n = 15). Nineteen patients were given an initial 2 g MgSO4 bolus i.v. and a 1 g/hour continuous infusion over 6 hours. To evaluate the presence of Mg deficiency, urine was collected from the onset of treatment and continued for the next 24 hours, and the excretion rate of administered Mg was calculated. Ventricular rates were obtained at baseline, after MgSO4 bolus, and every 15 minutes for the first hour. The decrease in the VR was statistically significant at 15, 30 and 60 minutes after Mg therapy (p = 0.0025, p < 0.001, p > 0.001). There was no difference in the response to Mg therapy between Mg deficient and nondeficient patients at 15, 30 or 60 minutes after therapy (p = 0.41, p = 0.28, p = 0.08). It is concluded that i.v. MgSO4 has a statistically significant but clinically limited effect on VR and this effect did not differ between patients with and without Mg deficiency.
