Hi.

I using urjtag #1689 to play svf files with a FT2232H cable. When I use 
the 'progress' option I get tons of messages like these:
.....
usbconn_ftd2xx_write end: xferred 0
usbconn_ftd2xx_write begin: len 3, recv 0
usbconn_ftd2xx_write end: xferred 0
usbconn_ftd2xx_write begin: len 3, recv 0
usbconn_ftd2xx_write end: xferred 0
usbconn_ftd2xx_write begin: len 3, recv 0
usbconn_ftd2xx_write end: xferred 0
usbconn_ftd2xx_write begin: len 3, recv 0
usbconn_ftd2xx_write end: xferred 0
usbconn_ftd2xx_write begin: len 3, recv 0
usbconn_ftd2xx_write end: xferred 0
usbconn_ftd2xx_write begin: len 3, recv 0
usbconn_ftd2xx_write end: xferred 0
usbconn_ftd2xx_write begin: len 171, recv 0
usbconn_ftd2xx_write end: xferred 0
usbconn_ftd2xx_write begin: len 3, recv 0
usbconn_ftd2xx_write end: xferred 0
usbconn_ftd2xx_write begin: len 3, recv 0
usbconn_ftd2xx_write end: xferred 0
usbconn_ftd2xx_write begin: len 3, recv 0
usbconn_ftd2xx_write end: xferred 0
usbconn_ftd2xx_write begin: len 3, recv 1
usbconn_ftd2xx_write end: xferred 0
usbconn_ftd2xx_write begin: len 1, recv 1
usbconn_ftd2xx_write end:
.....
Without the 'progress' option these messages are not shown. The problem 
is that using 'progress' changes the verbosity level from normal to 
detail, and in 'urjtag\src\tap\usbconn\libftd2xx.c' all the logs have 
level DETAIL.

I don't have a patch, but replacing all the ocurrences of 
"URJ_LOG_LEVEL_DETAIL" to "URJ_LOG_LEVEL_COMM"  in 
"urjtag\src\tap\usbconn\libftd2xx.c" works just fine.

Gastón





------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Verizon Developer Community
Take advantage of Verizon's best-in-class app development support
A streamlined, 14 day to market process makes app distribution fast and easy
Join now and get one step closer to millions of Verizon customers
http://p.sf.net/sfu/verizon-dev2dev 
_______________________________________________
UrJTAG-development mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/urjtag-development

Reply via email to