> I could change URJ_TAP_CABLE_CLOCK to use the new semantics of > arg.clock.tms if we had only ft2232 cables. But I'm not sure we can also > change that for usbblaster and generic cables or there is any benefits > for those cables. I see URJ_TAP_CABLE_CLOCK_COMPACT as a ft2232 specific > action. It is only generated in ft2232 cable drivers and gets handled > there. So it will not affect the upper layers.
Ok, guess it's clear to me now. I also see a performance improvement of up to 20% for certain tasks. So from my side it would be fine to introduce this patch in trunk. Thanks a lot Arnim ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ The Planet: dedicated and managed hosting, cloud storage, colocation Stay online with enterprise data centers and the best network in the business Choose flexible plans and management services without long-term contracts Personal 24x7 support from experience hosting pros just a phone call away. http://p.sf.net/sfu/theplanet-com _______________________________________________ UrJTAG-development mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/urjtag-development
