On Thursday, August 19, 2010 03:23:48 Frans Meulenbroeks wrote:
> improve the speed of gpio_set_valuea by using fputc instead of fprintf
> the overhead of fputc is less as no format string needs to be scanned
> and processed. Also used value + '0' so no conversion is needed

i'd like an ack from Stefano, but this looks fine

couldnt you also use fgetc() in get_value ?

perhaps we should add to the top of both funcs that we assume the sysfs layer 
is working only with '1' and '0'.  that would keep things from doing 
fprintf/fscanf.  i think that's an OK assumption to make.
-mike

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by 

Make an app they can't live without
Enter the BlackBerry Developer Challenge
http://p.sf.net/sfu/RIM-dev2dev 
_______________________________________________
UrJTAG-development mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/urjtag-development

Reply via email to