On Wed, 9 Feb 2011, Mike Frysinger wrote: > On Tuesday, February 08, 2011 22:38:30 steve tell wrote: >> This is a standalone package so far which builds with the usual "python >> ./setup.py build; python ./setup.py install" after installing urjtag. >> But I'd like to see it eventually merged into urjtag and built along with >> it. > > i'm guessing chain.c is not generated ? if you're coding that file yourself, > you'll need to fix the style to match the rest of urjtag.
Hi Mike, All valid suggestions. Do you (or does anyone) have a specification for the style of urjtag code expressed as indent(1) options or some such thing? I think I will soon finally have some time to work on turning this into a usable patch. Steve > the setup.py should be using local urjtag includes/libs from $srcdir / > $builddir rather than any random path. > > let's plan on integrating bindings in a top level "bindings" directory. so > the python one would live at: > urjtag/bindings/python/ > > the configure script should grow an --enable-python flag which would control > the automatic building of it ... > > otherwise, i dont have a problem adding bindings that people contribute. not > like i have interest/time to develop them myself ;). > -mike > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ What You Don't Know About Data Connectivity CAN Hurt You This paper provides an overview of data connectivity, details its effect on application quality, and explores various alternative solutions. http://p.sf.net/sfu/progress-d2d _______________________________________________ UrJTAG-development mailing list UrJTAG-development@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/urjtag-development
