On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 7:52 PM, Mike Frysinger <[email protected]> wrote: > On Wednesday, June 22, 2011 19:44:53 Mike Frysinger wrote: >> On Wednesday, June 22, 2011 15:36:17 Jie Zhang wrote: >> > It seems that yours depends on this observation: Automake does not >> > substitute the variable in target when processing the user defined rule. >> >> pretty much. it goes even further though in that the variable i'm using is >> generated by automake itself, so it'd be a matter of recursion for it to >> figure things out. >> >> thus with my patch, automake will continue to take care of spitting out the >> default rules and make will parse it as a simple dependency. > > actually, now that i think about it a bit more, the current code using > $(OBJEXT) is taking advantage of this exact same feature. automake could not > parse that foo.$(OBJEXT) was the same thing as foo.o/foo.lo, so it ignored it > and generated standard rules. make then treated it as just a dependency rule, > and everything worked out fine. > Exactly.
Jie ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Simplify data backup and recovery for your virtual environment with vRanger. Installation's a snap, and flexible recovery options mean your data is safe, secure and there when you need it. Data protection magic? Nope - It's vRanger. Get your free trial download today. http://p.sf.net/sfu/quest-sfdev2dev _______________________________________________ UrJTAG-development mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/urjtag-development
