On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 5:32 PM, Mike Frysinger <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Monday, June 27, 2011 17:20:38 Jie Zhang wrote:
>> On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 5:17 PM, Mike Frysinger <[email protected]> wrote:
>> > On Monday, June 27, 2011 16:48:21 Jie Zhang wrote:
>> >> * urjtag.h should not be in the dist package. It's generated when user
>> >> run configure.
>> >
>> > true, but urjtag.h.in needs to be ...
>>
>> It seems urjtag.h.in will be added to dist package automatically. I
>> don't know why.
>
> probably because we use AC_CONFIG_HEADER on it
>
> in thinking about it a bit more, i'm not sure this change is correct. `make
> install` probably no longer installs urjtag.h which is what we want.
>
> perhaps you want to use:
> nodist_pkginclude_HEADERS = urjtag.h
>
You are right. As you suggested, I have committed this patch. Tested
by "make dist" and "make install".
Jie
* include/urjtag/Makefile.am (nodist_pkginclude_HEADERS): New and
add urjtag.h.
Index: include/urjtag/Makefile.am
===================================================================
--- include/urjtag/Makefile.am (revision 1922)
+++ include/urjtag/Makefile.am (working copy)
@@ -57,3 +57,6 @@
svf.h \
types.h \
usbconn.h
+
+nodist_pkginclude_HEADERS = \
+ urjtag.h
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
All of the data generated in your IT infrastructure is seriously valuable.
Why? It contains a definitive record of application performance, security
threats, fraudulent activity, and more. Splunk takes this data and makes
sense of it. IT sense. And common sense.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-d2d-c2
_______________________________________________
UrJTAG-development mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/urjtag-development
