On Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 12:45 PM, Mike Frysinger <[email protected]> wrote: > On Tuesday, June 28, 2011 10:26:35 Jie Zhang wrote: >> On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 1:56 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote: >> > On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 09:29, Jie Zhang wrote: >> >> [Resend with a smaller patch. The original patch email is pending for >> >> list moderator's approval because the size exceeding 100KB. I don't >> >> know when the moderator will see it. So I resend it with a smaller >> >> patch with trivial stuff removed.] >> > >> > i can add you to said list if you want >> >> I would like to see this limit to be relaxed or removed. I have >> encountered this limit for several times. I also saw others >> encountered this limit in the past. > > i'd rather not. people sometimes hit this limit because they're doing > something wrong. i certainly dont want to see an e-mail of 1MiB+ data files > coming across the list (this has come up before). > But currently the limit is only 100KB. How about relax it to 200KB. According to the statistics of all the patch emails of various mailing lists in my gmail box, 200KB should be a good limit for UrJTAG according to its project size.
> as long as the default case expands into the const lookup table, this looks > fine to me. > I don't understand this. Jie ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ All of the data generated in your IT infrastructure is seriously valuable. Why? It contains a definitive record of application performance, security threats, fraudulent activity, and more. Splunk takes this data and makes sense of it. IT sense. And common sense. http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-d2d-c2 _______________________________________________ UrJTAG-development mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/urjtag-development
