On Wed, 17 Aug 2011, Tomek CEDRO wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 17, 2011 at 2:53 AM, Mike Frysinger <[email protected]> wrote:
> the git repo has nothing to do with python. Tomek's subthread on git was
> unrelated to the python work.
It seems that Python bindings are not on the repository yet, but the
(working?) patches were sent already to the list and could be applied
locally.. Steve's python-urjtag package can be still found at
http://www.telltronics.org/pub/ but it might differ from what will
find in the repository I guess :-)
Yes, http://www.telltronics.org/pub/python-urjtag.tar.gz might work but is
rather old.
My latest patchset, can be found at http://www.telltronics.org/pub/urjtag
. It is against the current urjtag git repo and is what I'm using
currently. It reflects the history of my work (as 1 patch for each of
around 9 local commits).
I intend to clean this up into at most 2 or 3 patches for another posting
to this list: one patch against existing liburjtag applies changes to
improve and extend the C api, another adds the python bindings. Perhaps a
third patch adds the device data for the parts I've been testing against.
I think that's the easiest to review and submit.
Steve
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Get a FREE DOWNLOAD! and learn more about uberSVN rich system,
user administration capabilities and model configuration. Take
the hassle out of deploying and managing Subversion and the
tools developers use with it. http://p.sf.net/sfu/wandisco-d2d-2
_______________________________________________
UrJTAG-development mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/urjtag-development
