On Tue, Feb 07, 2017 at 09:10:17AM +0100, Kolja Waschk wrote: > Hi, > > The development could move to primarily use git on SF as well, IMHO > there's no need to change the provider, and why change the name? > > Anyway, if you all decide to move to github, appropriate redirecting > information can be put on the SF site.
It doesn't matter where an abandoned project is hosted. > > What is needed to get it included? > > Main problem at the moment however is that there is no really actively > caring maintainer at the SF project. I doubt that changes if you add > moving to another server on the to-do list. > > I feel somewhat responsible, but even after reading the mails in the > past weeks I haven't found time to actively help yet. Sorry for that. > > What is currently highest priority on the to-do list for UrJTAG? Showing the world that this project is not completely abandoned. That be easy done by applying the patch in the start of this thread. Groeten Geert Stappers -- Leven en laten leven ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most engaging tech sites, SlashDot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot _______________________________________________ UrJTAG-development mailing list UrJTAG-development@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/urjtag-development
