On Wed, Mar 29, 2017 at 09:12:13PM +0200, Tomasz CEDRO wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 29, 2017 at 8:51 PM, Kolja Waschk <urj...@ixo.de> wrote:
> >> that would imply moving to github first..?
> >
> > It seems currently there is no one available to do that, latest "major
> > move" is to use only git, but at SourceForge.
> 
> Hey Kolja! Why not GitHub? That could improve the project development
> and testing amazingly. Maybe UrJTAG at GitHub as workbench but core at
> SF?
> 
> The problem with GitHub was that UrJTAG project was already taken
> there! Do you know how to take it over? :-)
> 
> > Maybe I can compress the last years of commit messages into some
> > sentences for the NEWS text and we can at least make a somewhat formal
> > release with the current state soon.
> 
> Yea, a release would be highly desired! Maybe also good way and reason
> to try out the GitHub? :-)
> 

Our SF git repository has now a .travis.yml file.

Does it in the github environment do what it is supposed to do?



Groeten
Geert Stappers
-- 
Leven en laten leven

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
_______________________________________________
UrJTAG-development mailing list
UrJTAG-development@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/urjtag-development

Reply via email to