Geert Stappers <stapp...@stappers.nl> hat am 11. Mai 2017 um 23:53 geschrieben:
On Tue, May 09, 2017 at 11:17:39PM +0200, Geert Stappers wrote:
On Tue, May 09, 2017 at 09:32:06PM +0200, Jan Willeke wrote:
cable_gpio: bugfix - gpio cabel fails for pin number 4
--- a/urjtag/src/tap/cable/gpio.c
+++ b/urjtag/src/tap/cable/gpio.c
@@ -216,10 +216,10 @@ gpio_connect (urj_cable_t *cable, const urj_param_t *params[])
return URJ_STATUS_FAIL;
}
- cable_params->jtag_gpios[GPIO_TDI] = GPIO_REQUIRED;
- cable_params->jtag_gpios[GPIO_TDO] = GPIO_REQUIRED;
- cable_params->jtag_gpios[GPIO_TMS] = GPIO_REQUIRED;
cable_params->jtag_gpios[GPIO_TCK] = GPIO_REQUIRED;
cable_params->jtag_gpios[GPIO_TDI] = GPIO_UNSET;
- cable_params->jtag_gpios[GPIO_TDO] = GPIO_UNSET;
- cable_params->jtag_gpios[GPIO_TMS] = GPIO_UNSET;
cable_params->jtag_gpios[GPIO_TCK] = GPIO_UNSET;
if (params != NULL)
/* parse arguments beyond the cable name */
for (i = 0; params[i] != NULL; i++)
@@ -253,7 +253,7 @@ gpio_connect (urj_cable_t *cable, const urj_param_t *params[])
*/for (i = GPIO_TDI; i <= GPIO_TDO; i++)
if (cable_params->jtag_gpios[i] == GPIO_REQUIRED)
if (cable_params->jtag_gpios[i] == GPIO_UNSET)
{
urj_error_set (URJ_ERROR_SYNTAX, _("missing required gpios\n"));
gpio_help (URJ_ERROR_SYNTAX, "gpio");
--
2.1.4I think that I understand what the change in the code does.
It is the compaion text on the code change that makes
me hesiate to apply the patch.To be continued.
Rewrite proposal of companion text:
enumerated GPIO_REQUIRED blocks using pin 4
GPIO_REQUIRED was used for two things: "last" and "unset"
Last pin can be a valid pin.
"unset" should be a separate value.sign of by Jan Willeke so he gets the credits
@@ -42,7 +42,7 @@
#define GPIO_PATH "/sys/class/gpio/"
#define GPIO_EXPORT_PATH GPIO_PATH "export"
#define GPIO_UNEXPORT_PATH GPIO_PATH "unexport"
-
+#define GPIO_UNSET -1
/* pin mapping */
enum {
GPIO_TDI = 0,@@ -45,6 +45,7 @@
/* pin mapping */
enum {
- GPIO_UNSET = -1,
GPIO_TDI = 0,
GPIO_TCK,
GPIO_TMS,Groeten
Geert Stappers
--
Leven en laten leven
Hi Geert,
Thanks for rewriting the companion text and putting the -1 into the enum.
I fully agree with your changes.
regards Jan
------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
_______________________________________________ UrJTAG-development mailing list UrJTAG-development@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/urjtag-development