On Tue, Dec 05, 2017 at 10:15:31PM +0100, Jean THOMAS wrote: > Hi ! > > I came up with some modifications on UrJTAG source code to support > SST39VF160x and SST39VF320x flash chips. Those chips needs some > special unlock addresses (0x5555/0x2AAA instead of the regular CFI > 0x555/0x2AAA). The applied patches shouldn't break existing CFI > flash compatibility. > > The source code has been uploaded here : > https://github.com/jeanthom/urjtag-sst39vf160x-sst39vf320x >
Quick first scan done. I'm not happy with changes in flash/amd.c for SST chips. And CFI_VENDOR_SST_WEIRD should be something like CFI_VENDOR_SST_MPFP or another acronym that matches "Multi-Purpose Flash Plus" from the datasheet. > Could this be merged into mainline ? Not as it currently is. Cheers Geert Stappers P.S. Thanks for the reminder on "dirty JTAG" ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot _______________________________________________ UrJTAG-development mailing list UrJTAG-development@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/urjtag-development
