On Wed, Mar 21, 2018 at 01:47:32PM +0100, Jiri Gaisler wrote: > On 03/21/2018 11:39 AM, Geert Stappers wrote: > > means something like "with this patch works 2017.10pre2 for me" ... > > Apologies, I am new to this project.
No worries, welcome to UrJTAG > The 2017.10pre2 works fine for me on Ubuntu 16.04 and 17.10. Yes! That is the "go" for 2017.10 \o/ > I'm using FT2232 to access a Xilinx XC6V FPGA > with libusb-1.0 and libftdi1. The only problem I have is that I cannot > build UrJTAG in a separate build directory unless I disable the python > bindings. Building inside the source tree works fine, so it is a minor > issue: > > make[3]: Entering directory > '/home/jiri/ibm/src/jtag/urjtag/b1/bindings/python' <snip/> > make[3]: Leaving directory '/home/jiri/ibm/src/jtag/urjtag/b1/bindings/python' Please raise that in a fresh thread. > I have also a patch that adds a bus driver for the AHBJTAG IP core in > GRLIB (Leon3 open source processor). Should I wait to post this until a > stable release of UrJTAG has been made ...? Both choices are fine. But you are seeking advice: Wait a few days, so I can focus 2017.10 getting out. > In addition, I am adding debug support for a RISC-V processor to UrJTAG, > in the style of what is currently implemented for the Bfin processors. > Will this be accepted into the project or should I rather make a fork > and publish it elsewhere? There is no need for a fork, because _adding_ doesn't break existing setups. Groeten Geert Stappers -- Leven en laten leven ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot _______________________________________________ UrJTAG-development mailing list UrJTAG-development@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/urjtag-development