On Wed, Mar 21, 2018 at 01:47:32PM +0100, Jiri Gaisler wrote:
> On 03/21/2018 11:39 AM, Geert Stappers wrote:
> > means something like "with this patch works 2017.10pre2 for me" ...
> Apologies, I am new to this project.

No worries, welcome to UrJTAG

> The 2017.10pre2 works fine for me on Ubuntu 16.04 and 17.10.

That is the "go" for 2017.10   \o/

> I'm using FT2232 to access a Xilinx XC6V FPGA
> with libusb-1.0 and libftdi1. The only problem I have is that I cannot
> build UrJTAG in a separate build directory unless I disable the python
> bindings. Building inside the source tree works fine, so it is a minor
> issue:
> make[3]: Entering directory 
> '/home/jiri/ibm/src/jtag/urjtag/b1/bindings/python'
> make[3]: Leaving directory '/home/jiri/ibm/src/jtag/urjtag/b1/bindings/python'

Please raise that in a fresh thread.

> I have also a patch that adds a bus driver for the AHBJTAG IP core in
> GRLIB (Leon3 open source processor).  Should I wait to post this until a
> stable release of UrJTAG has been made ...?

Both choices are fine.
But you are seeking advice:
 Wait a few days, so I can focus 2017.10 getting out.

> In addition, I am adding debug support for a RISC-V processor to UrJTAG,
> in the style of what is currently implemented for the Bfin processors.
> Will this be accepted into the project or should I rather make a fork
> and publish it elsewhere?

There is no need for a fork,
because _adding_ doesn't break existing setups.

Geert Stappers
Leven en laten leven

Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
UrJTAG-development mailing list

Reply via email to