On Thursday, August 8, 2019, Acknowledge <stapp...@stappers.nl> wrote:
> > > > Then manufaturer (the full name) is only used in presentation, like > > in print chain. > > > > There is no way that we can know that this chip is from that year when > > that company owned the idcode. > > > > Why not just take current owner of the id as shown in (latest) jep106 > > and be done with it ? > > > We agree on that > * anybody should provide a patch > * it is OK if somebody does I am happy someone has worked on it. It is really annoying to NOT have the feature as an end user. Keep pushing! -- Benjamin Henrion (zoobab) Email: zoobab at gmail.com Mobile: +32-484-566109 Web: http://www.zoobab.com FFII.org Brussels "In July 2005, after several failed attempts to legalise software patents in Europe, the patent establishment changed its strategy. Instead of explicitly seeking to sanction the patentability of software, they are now seeking to create a central European patent court, which would establish and enforce patentability rules in their favor, without any possibility of correction by competing courts or democratically elected legislators."
_______________________________________________ UrJTAG-development mailing list UrJTAG-development@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/urjtag-development
