Ian Ward wrote: > I can make calc_width and calc_text_pos (the one that will be > important for Edit widgets) faster by using re.subn in some fancy > ways. However, I don't know if I want to go down that path because it > would obfuscate the code. Another option is to write those functions > in C, but that would mean distributing compiled binaries.. > > If Urwid's performance is acceptable the way it is now?
Once I have the full piece of software written (and not just tests), I will do more performance evaluations - we'll see then. I think there's no need to jump the gun here, there might be other bottlenecks to optimize. -- Naked _______________________________________________ Urwid mailing list [email protected] http://lists.excess.org/mailman/listinfo/urwid
