Victor Stinner wrote:
Ooops, urwid-unicode.patch and urwid-unicode-tab2.patch were buggy. I fixed
the bug and also improve it.
New version (urwid-unicode-v7.patch), better (no more space/tab conflict) and
*faster*!
New benchmark
without the patch: 7.8 sec
with the patch: 2.7 sec
Your patch conflicts with this change:
http://excess.org/urwid/changeset/48
This is a patch you can apply against 0.9.7.1 (with the right -p parameter):
http://excess.org/urwid/changeset/48?format=diff
===
Where/How can I download urwid by subversion?
I've just set up public svn access, so you could use this too:
svn co https://excess.org/svn/urwid/urwid/trunk
Please let me know if your changes perform better than the ones I've
committed.
===
Would it be possible to use spaces in urwid code because I hate TAB! PEP 8
propose "4 spaces per indentation level":
http://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0008/
I prefer tabs in code -- they force me to write shallow functions and
keep me from worrying about aligning and realigning continued lines.
They also represent ~0.8% of the available ascii space that would
otherwise go to waste :-)
However, it seems the Python world has spoken. I suppose I will have to
relent, eventually...
Ian
_______________________________________________
Urwid mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.excess.org/mailman/listinfo/urwid
