Ian Ward wrote: > James Reeves wrote: >> The solution, I expect, would be to allow canvases of zero area to be >> rendered; or perhaps for container widgets (such as Columns, Piles, >> Frames etc.) not to render any widget if its size has a 0 in the width >> or height column. This is based on the principle that even if the user >> shrinks down the terminal window to such a small size that he cannot >> even see half the widgets, it is better to keep the program running and >> not to show those widgets, then to panic and exit the application. >> >> Are there any plans to implement such a change already? Or is there any >> reason why this is a really bad idea? > > I am planning to fix this problem in the container widgets as you > describe. To be more specific, box widgets need to cope with column or > row sizes of zero (and produce canvases sized that way), flow widgets > and fixed widgets are unchanged. >
Hello, please try the latest svn version to see if it works for you now. Changeset 137 allows box widgets to render 0-row canvases, which should fix your problem. Ian _______________________________________________ Urwid mailing list [email protected] http://lists.excess.org/mailman/listinfo/urwid
