Max E. Kuznecov wrote:
> 2008/4/24, Max E. Kuznecov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>>
>> Ok, I'll prepare a patch as for now. Maybe later I will come up with
>> something more flexible.
>>
>
> It seems some of the cons25 terminal escape codes conflicting with
> already defined in escape.py:
> :k1=\E[M for F1 and this already defined as ('[M', 'mouse')
> as well as kN=\E[G for page_down already exists in escape.py ('[G','5')
> And a a result urwid raises:
> AssertionError: trie conflict detected
>
> Is there some way to solve this issue?
I guess we have to do it properly then -- try the values from termcap
first, then fall back to the default interpretation.
Ian
_______________________________________________
Urwid mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.excess.org/mailman/listinfo/urwid
