James Mills wrote: > On Fri, Jul 18, 2008 at 1:17 AM, Ian Ward <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Absolutely. The wsgi code currently works for the tour.py example in >> the "default" branch, but the way wsgi uses iterators made quite a few >> not-so-pretty changes necessary. > > Got revisions I can compare ? > Now that you're using Mercurial (yay!) this is now a whole lot easier!
The changes are in these two patches (on the default branch): https://excess.org/hg/urwid/rev/4edf868eb9e9 https://excess.org/hg/urwid/rev/528cbaff67ac The next release will be somewhat disruptive. I have already introduced a generic_main_loop() function that will simplify most of the Urwid scripts out there. The wsgi code uses an iterable_main_loop() function. It might be possible to combine them so that users don't have to special-case their code for using wsgi. The result of that combination could be the next suggested way of using the library for new applications. Ian _______________________________________________ Urwid mailing list [email protected] http://lists.excess.org/mailman/listinfo/urwid
