On Mon, Oct 20, 2008 at 2:53 PM, Ian Ward <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > So, one solution would be to use processes instead of threads (generally > good advice in any case) But I wonder if disabling the signal that you > are being sent would also work.. I'll try it when I have a few minutes.
The problem using processing instead of threads is that inter-process communication isn't that trivial. Reading the urwid source code i also realize that the original approach was wrong. I should catch input from the main thread and keep the other logic in other thread. With this approach, of course it works. Thank you for your time. M. _______________________________________________ Urwid mailing list [email protected] http://lists.excess.org/mailman/listinfo/urwid
