On Mon, May 3, 2010 at 7:11 PM, Ian Ward <[email protected]> wrote: > Rob Lanphier wrote on 2010-04-24 03:29: > > I probably won't be able to incorporate feedback before Sunday, but I'd > > still like your thoughts because I'm probably also going to use this at > > OSCON in July. > > It looks like a great introduction, Rob. > > I've used github to make minor comments: > http://github.com/robla/urwid-demo/comments
Excellent! I'll probably do another rev of the examples before July, reordering some stuff. Thanks for the really detailed feedback! I think your closures are the simplest way to do what you're trying to > with the the FieldManager class. > Yeah, I think once the checkbox sneaks in there, then having a generic, widget-independent way of getting the data means having a closure. One thing that occurred to me which I might implement in one of the beginning revisions is a really simple loop though all of the fields calling get_edit_text() on each. Since the early revisions only have text-entry, I can get away with that, and then introduce the FieldManager concept at the same point I add the checkbox. > It would be great to have as part of the documentation, maybe as a > screencast? > Sure, I was dabbling with the idea. I'm about to start a non-urwid related contract job, so I'll probably have less time to devote to this stuff, but I should be able to crank something out one of these weekends. Rob
_______________________________________________ Urwid mailing list [email protected] http://lists.excess.org/mailman/listinfo/urwid
