goffi wrote on 2010-08-23 03:32: > On 21/08/10 20:51, Ian Ward wrote: >> That's great to see. Is there any chance you would license that file >> more permissively so that parts of it might become part of Urwid? (Urwid >> is LGPLv2) >> > > Well, I will keep my main project under GPL v3, but I can understand the > need of LGPL for a library, so what can I do is separate the widgets in > a library, and release it under LGPL. BTW, why are you using LGPL v2 > instead of v3 ?
Urwid is old (predates GPLv3) and I'm not interested enough in licensing to have done a comparison. I did initially release Urwid under the GPL but changed to the LGPL after someone asked for a more permissive license. > I would really be happy to see theses widgets part of Urwid, but I think > the code need some work to reach your coding standard and to follow your > coding style (it use a mix of CamelCase and underline_names as I use > CamelCase for function names, and Urwid use underlines), it probably > need a review from Urwid devs. > > In addition, I use some stuff specific to my project, which need to be a > little more generic (for example the code to render focus is really > ugly). I put below a list of the available widgets. Please also note > that I'm currently travelling, until next December, so I'm not easily > available on IRC (I don't always have an Internet connexion), so the > best is probably to contact me by mail. Once the widgets are separated out I could start by putting them in with the contributed examples. I know people would find them useful even in their current state. Ian _______________________________________________ Urwid mailing list [email protected] http://lists.excess.org/mailman/listinfo/urwid
