Patrick Totzke wrote on 2011-07-06 05:45:
> Yes, I was indeed thinking of named pipes. I haven't done that much
> thread programming so far.
> So what I would want to do here is
> 1) define a callback that will update my widgets
> 2) call mainloop.watch_pipe with that callback, storing the
> pipe-handle somewhere,
> 3) fork/start a thread that can access the pipe-handle, do something
> 4) write to the pipe from inside the thread
> am i right?
> thanks!

That's right.  I've pushed up an example here (this one uses
subprocess.Popen, but the concept is the same):

http://excess.org/urwid/changeset/551%3Ae79886942bd7

_______________________________________________
Urwid mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.excess.org/mailman/listinfo/urwid

Reply via email to